[Home] [Up]
| http://www.openguitar.com | Revision: Sep 20 2011
Scales ComparisonDavid Raleigh ArnoldA Summary of the Advantages of the Scales in “Dynamic Guitar Technique” (DGT) Over All Others
Let the Rumpus BeginThe detailed comparisons below will show the perceptive player or teacher how technical exercises for guitar should be constructed. Each item of comparison is a consideration which was weighed. Theory follows practice. Fundamental concepts usually don’t reveal themselves until after the work is done. About Scale SetsOf course technical exercises must be beautiful, not as a work of art but as a manifestation of order, as a perfect circle or triangle is beautiful. It’s hard for any artist to keep working on an exercise that’s ugly. Segovia’s are the best of all the rest, and others score far lower. Please compare others, any of them. “Fail” means there was insufficient or no consideration of the issue at all. Scales on a single string are better than scales in a single position, but they are unduly tedious. Extended scales or position scales are not pure technical exercises, working on them solves few technical problems, and they do not require enough change of hand position to prevent repetetive motion injury. I don’t consider them worthy of consideration, but I compare them anyway. The position scales and Aguado one-octave scales are considered to be general types, so they are credited with being as good as the type could possibly be made. No existing examples are as good as this comparison indicates. Right hand considerations are not addressed here, nor should they be. Scales do not provide intense practice in moving from string to string, which is why the arpeggios in DGT should be considered indispensible regardless. If you consider that this comparison lacks important questions, or that it is somehow unfair, contact me. Scale ComparisonThe Contenders, Listed from Least to Most Boring
QuestionsDGT Sgva posn Agdo Exploits the whole musical range of the instrument? pass pass fail fail Exploits the whole physical range of the instrument? pass fail fail fail Opens and closes the hand laterally? pass pass fail pass Reasonable and appropriate extensions of fingers? pass fail pass pass System includes one octave for beginners? pass fail pass pass Systematic shift practice? pass fail fail pass Same positions rising and descending? pass fail fail pass Systematic position practice? pass fail fail fail Includes augmented 2nd interval? pass fail fail fail Includes 2-3 3-2 finger sequences? pass fail pass pass Equal use of fingers? pass fail fail pass Equal use of finger combinations? pass fail pass pass Equal use of fingers in shifts? pass fail fail fail Same fingers shifted to and from for each of two octaves? pass fail fail fail One or more shifts in each of two octaves? pass fail fail fail Same shifts in each of two octaves? pass fail fail fail Fingering repeated in each of two octaves? pass fail fail fail Compression (Squeeze) shifts? pass fail pass fail Examples of octave joining according to fingering within octaves? pass fail fail fail All two and three octave scales ascend to above the 14th fret? pass fail fail fail Shifting to and from every finger? pass fail fail pass No habits formed to influence fingering of
music? pass fail fail fail Slide of 2nd finger? pass fail fail pass Third octave added without changing the other two? pass fail fail fail End Notes:§1 If you can repeat a fingering, the result is four times as good because:
If you can repeat three times, it’s nine times as good, etc.. That arithmetic is one of the most important things to understand about fingering. (The idea relates to music even more than to exercises. A pattern in the fingering is also a pattern in the music, so this thinking also improves the interpretation of any sort of music.) §2 The DGT arpeggios are the best practice for this. Arpeggios are recommended for keyboard players because they open and close the hand laterally in very much the same manner. Scales don’t do it very much, but position scales do it the least. §3 The distance between the 3rd and 4th fingers at the 15th to the 17th fret is the same as the distance at the 3rd and 4th frets. A refusal to practice the extension of the 4th or 1st finger is uncompromising, to say the least. §4 The advantage to having the same finger placements rising and descending is that it makes the scale easier to learn, in two ways:
Segovia as a matter of preference fingered two notes per position rising and three descending, which reduces the number of placements of weaker fingers. That might be sensible if you were ever going to play scales in concert. As my first teacher (Bill Harris) pointed out to me more than fifty years ago, scales which are different in rising and descending should also be practiced backwards. I must point out that having the fingers placed when descending where they were placed when rising does not really constitute the same fingering up and down, because the fingers are placed in the opposite order. That is not an issue. §5 Otherwise there is little reason to practice the minors at all. The only difference other minor scales have from majors is at the top. §6 Playing in position, you tend to use the 1st and 4th fingers almost twice as much as the 2nd and 3rd. Total equality is not possible, but one has to make an effort to get a reasonable balance. §7 Some position scales will allow one fret of shifting between the ③ and ② string, §8 This prevents injury by making the wrist flex in every bout. §9 I have seen Segovia fall prey to this in concert when playing the Sor-Mozart variations. [Home] [Up] ©2009 David Raleigh Arnold - Latest revision: Sep 20 2011 - http://www.openguitar.com |