[Home] [Up]
| http://www.openguitar.com | Revision: May 9 2010
Scale ComparisonDavid Raleigh ArnoldA Summary of the Advantages of the Scales in `Dynamic Guitar Technique’ Over All Others
Segovia’s Scales vs. DGT ScalesThe detailed comparisons below show the perceptive player or teacher how technical exercises for guitar should be constructed. Each item of comparison is a consideration which was weighed. Theory follows practice. Fundamental concepts usually don’t reveal themselves until after the work is done. About Scale SetsOf course technical exercises must be beautiful, not so much as a work of art but as a manifestation of order, as a perfect circle or triangle is beautiful. It’s hard for any artist to keep working on an exercise that’s ugly. Segovia's are the best of all the rest, and others would score far lower if there were numbers. Please compare others, any of them. “Fail” means there was insufficient or no consideration of the issue at all. Scales on a single string are better than scales in a single position, but they are unduly tedious. Extended scales or position scales are not pure technical exercises, and working on them solves few technical problems. I don’t consider them worthy of consideration, but please compare them anyway. Right hand considerations are not addressed here, nor should they be. Scales do not provide intense practice in moving from string to string, which is why the arpeggios in DGT should be considered indispensible regardless. Scale ComparisonThe ContendersDGT = The Scales in Dynamic Guitar Technique: openguitar.com/files/scales.pdf Sgva = The Scales of Segovia QuestionsDGT Sgva Exploits the whole musical range of the instrument? pass pass Exploits the whole physical range of the instrument? pass fail Versions, including one octave for beginners? pass fail Systematic shift practice? pass fail Same positions rising and
pass fail Systematic position practice? pass fail Includes augmented 2nd
pass fail Includes 2-3 3-2 finger sequences? pass fail Equal use of fingers? pass fail Equal use of finger combinations? pass fail Equal use of fingers in shifts? pass fail Same fingers shifted to and from for each of two octaves? pass fail One or more shifts in each of two octaves? pass fail Same shifts in each of two octaves? pass fail Fingering repeated in each of two octaves? pass fail Compression (Squeeze) shifts? pass fail Examples of octave joining according to fingering within octaves? pass fail All 2 & 3 8ve scales ascend to above the 14th
pass fail Reasonable and appropriate extensions of fingers? pass fail Shifting to and from every finger? pass fail No habits formed to influence fingering of
pass fail Slide of 2nd finger? pass fail Third octave added without changing the other two? pass fail Notes:§1 The advantage to having the same finger placements rising and descending is that it makes the scale easier to learn. Fingering two notes per position rising and almost always descending to the 4th finger to have three notes per position might be sensible if you were ever going to play scales in concert. Having the fingers placed when descending where they were placed when rising does not really constitute the same fingering, because the fingers are placed in the opposite order. §2 Otherwise there is little reason to practice the minors at all. §3 This prevents injury by making the wrist flex in every bout. §4 I have seen Segovia fall prey to this in concert when playing the Sor-Mozart variations. [Home] [Up] ©2009 David Raleigh Arnold - Latest revision: May 9 2010 - http://www.openguitar.com |